German: Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten. Main article: Critique of Judgment. Disputed [ edit ] Experience without theory is blind, but theory without experience is mere intellectual play. This is declared to be "an old Kantian maxim" in General Systems Vol. Kant's treatment of the transcendental logic in the First Critique contains a portion, of which this quote may be an ambiguously worded paraphrase. Kant, claiming that both reason and the senses are essential to the formation of our understanding of the world, writes: "Without sensibility no object would be given to us, and without understanding none would be thought.
Misattributed [ edit ] Do what is right, though the world may perish.
What is the Human Being?
It is also a question that Kant thought about deeply and returned to in many of his writings. In this lucid and wide-ranging introduction to Kant's philosophy of human nature - which is essential for understanding his thought as a whole - Patrick R. Frierson assesses Kant's theories and examines his critics. He begins by explaining how Kant articulates three ways of addressing the question 'what is the human being?
He then considers some of the great theorists of human nature who wrestle with Kant's views, such as Hegel, Marx, Darwin, Nietzsche, and Freud; contemporary thinkers such as E.
- 2. Kant’s Relationship to Hume and British Moral Philosophy!
- Advances in Artificial Life: 9th European Conference, ECAL 2007, Lisbon, Portugal, September 10-14, 2007. Proceedings.
Wilson and Daniel Dennett, who have sought biological explanations of human nature; Thomas Kuhn, Michel Foucault, and Clifford Geertz, who emphasize the diversity of human beings in different times and places; and existentialist philosophers such as Sartre and Heidegger. He argues that whilst these approaches challenge and enrich Kant's views in significant ways, all suffer from serious weaknesses that Kant's anthropology can address. Taking a core insight of Kant's - that human beings are fundamentally free but finite - he argues that it is the existentialists, particularly Sartre, who are the most direct heirs of his transcendental anthropology.
The final part of the book is an extremely helpful overview of the work of contemporary philosophers, particularly Christine Korsgaard and Jrgen Habermas. That being said, Frierson also avoids the temptation to apologize for Kant by appeal to his time and place. Kant cannot be excused by the prejudices of his day because he had access to discussions of gender and race that were much less sexist and racist than his own including one by his own student, Herder.
If I have one criticism of Part 1, it is the lack of discussion of Kant's own sources in the development of his empirical anthropology the influences on his transcendental theory are already thoroughly documented in the literature.
Andre formater / språk
Aside from a few references to well-known influences such as Rousseau and Kant's access to travelogues, we don't hear much about what Kant appealed to as he complied his empirical anthropology over the course of his career. Along similar lines, it would have been good to hear more about the relation between Kant's theory and other anthropologies from the ongoing Enlightenment, of which Kant was self-consciously a contributor.
Part 2 is a single-chapter interlude about several theories of human nature from the 19 th century. Frierson focuses on the dialectical idealism and materialism of Hegel and Marx respectively , Darwin's naturalism, Nietzsche's anti-universalist moral theory, and Freud's account of motivation based in his theory of the unconscious. Although these discussions are interesting and make for good reading, they are each too brief to count as more than quick overviews, and the brief contrasts with Kant usually only a paragraph or two at time only skim the surface.
Frierson turns to 20 th century accounts of human nature in the final 4 chapters Part 3.
Kant and Fichte on Belief and Knowledge
He addresses scientific naturalism Chapter 7 , historicism and human diversity Chapter 6 , existentialism Chapter 9 , and theories of normativity Chapter He manages to bring into focus a diverse range of contemporary or nearly contemporary perspectives on the question of human nature.
However, this part sometimes seems to suffer an identity crisis. It isn't always clear whether the primary goal is to present the contemporary views on their own terms, to trace the legacy and influence of Kant's theories through the 20 th century, or to "save" Kant's theory by showing how it or parts of it at least are consistent with later developments. To some extent it's certainly all of the above, but some of the discussions are more successful than others. The chapter on scientific naturalism addresses the threats posed by an evolutionary biological fatalism we're at the mercy of our genes and altruism is an illusion and a "situationist" psychological fatalism our actions are determined primarily by social context and free will is an illusion.
These are familiar problems that have been addressed extensively in both academic and popular literature, and Frierson does a good job laying out some of the most important theoretical and experimental results that provoke the familiar discussions and debates.
- Collective Memory and National Membership: Identity and Citizenship Models in Turkey and Austria.
- Om What is the Human Being?!
- An Academic Life: A Handbook for New Academics!
- The White Mans Burden: Why the Wests Efforts to Aid the Rest Have Done So Much Ill and So Little Good.
- Andre formater / språk.
But Kant's place in the discussion is not always a natural one. In a few places Frierson attempts to show that something like Kant's empirical psychology lives on in contemporary psychology, but this sometimes requires looking at things from a distance while squinting. For instance, with respect to Amos Tversky and Daniel Kahneman's "heuristics and biases" research program, he writes,.
Om What is the Human Being?
Of course, the specific principles Kant lays out are different from those discovered recently, but the overall structure of Kant's account -- supplementing a logic of ideal thought-processes with detailed empirical studies of systematic divergences from those ideals -- is consistent with contemporary developments. Fair enough, but Kant was certainly not the first to point out systematic cognitive biases in humans, and the specific details are what matter most in a lot of this research. It's also debatable whether Kant can be said to have conducted "detailed empirical studies.
The question regarding free will and any moral theory that depends on it is more fruitful, but once again it's not always clear whether the primary goal is to save Kant from contemporary theory or to use Kant in contemporary theorizing. If the goal is to save Kant, then sure, we can appeal to the possible distinction between empirical determinism and transcendental indeterminism so that freedom in transcendental idealism is not undermined.
But if the goal is to use Kant to save freedom, then readers today are going to want to place their bets on something more than transcendental idealism. In Frierson's defense, he doesn't rest his case on a metaphysical distinction between the natural realm and a non-spatiotemporal, noumenal realm which would surely be off-putting to most contemporary readers. While this perspectivism is surely Kant ian as in "Kant-inspired" , it is probably not the view of the historical Kant.
Chapter 8 "Historicism and Human Diversity" and Chapter 9 "Existentialism" discuss possible Kantian responses to various forms of relativism.